华硕 VivoBook E200HA (x5-Z8350, 32 GB) 小型笔记本简短评测物美价廉？华硕VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS是一台11.6英寸的小型笔记本电脑，以三种配色来吸引消费者。机内配有四核处理器。在我们的评测中，你将了解到该小型电脑的价格。Sebastian Bade, ✓ Manuel Masiero (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 09/01/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇪🇸 🇮🇹 Laptop / Notebook Windows
Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS (VivoBook Series)ProcessorIntel Atom x5-Z8350 4 x 1.4 - 1.9 GHz, Cherry TrailGraphics adapterIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 20.19.15.4364Memory2048 MB , DDR3Display11.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 135 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1130, N116BGE-EB2, TN LED, glossy: yesMainboardIntel Cherry TrailStorageHynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMC, 32 GB , 10 GB freeSoundcardIntel SST Audio DeviceConnections1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: stereo, SonicMaster, Card Reader: Micro-SD, Micro-HDMINetworkingQualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 17.5 x 286 x 193Battery38 Wh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Home 64 BitCameraWebcam: VGA 640x480Additional featuresSpeakers: SonicMaster sound, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, power supply, Office 365 (1 year subscription), 12 Months Warranty, fanlessWeight976 g, Power Supply: 130 g
Price249 EURLinksAsus homepageAsus notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
Size Comparison
Jumper EZbook 3 Medion Akoya S2218 Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook HP Stream 11-r000ng Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS DIN A4 ❌
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
ConnectionsLeft: power, microSD card reader, Micro-HDMI, USB 3.0
Right: Audio combo (Mic-In, Line-Out), USB 2.0
Front: status LEDs
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSQualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
237 MBit/s Jumper EZbook 3Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0
78 MBit/s -67% iperf3 receive AX12Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSQualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
315 MBit/s Jumper EZbook 3Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0
86 MBit/s -73%
280cd/m²270cd/m²277cd/m²278cd/m²267cd/m²265cd/m²239cd/m²250cd/m²259cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessChi Mei CMN1130, N116BGE-EB2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 280 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 265 cd/m² Minimum: 16.9 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 85 %Center on Battery: 222 cd/m²Contrast: 763:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)ΔE Color 6.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83ΔE Greyscale 7.84 | 0.09-98 Ø5.165% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)45.23% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)65.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)43.73% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)Gamma: 2.3Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSTN LED, 1366x768, 11.6"HP Stream 11-r000ngTN, 1366x768, 11.6"Jumper EZbook 3TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.1"Medion Akoya S2218IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6"Lenovo Flex 11 ChromebookIPS, 1366x768, 11.6"Display-3%18%10% Display P3 Coverage43.7342.52 -3%51.6 18%48.34 11% sRGB Coverage65.163.5 -2%77.3 19%70.1 8% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage45.2343.97 -3%53 17%50 11%Response Times-16%17%-22%-16% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *45 ?(25, 20)44 ?(24, 20) 2%46 ?(25, 21) -2%27 ?(7, 20) 40%33.6 ?(18.8, 14.8) 25% Response Time Black / White *18 ?(14, 4)24 ?(8, 16) -33%11.6 ?(7.7, 3.8) 36%33 ?(14, 19) -83%28 ?(16.4, 11.6) -56% PWM Frequency24750 ?(30)200 ?(99)200 ?(90)20830 ?(99)Screen-24%-50%10%2%Brightness middle267264 -1%384 44%417 56%275.1 3%Brightness265248 -6%341 29%394 49%255 -4%Brightness Distribution8584 -1%76 -11%88 4%85 0%Black Level *0.350.5 -43%1.28 -266%0.43 -23%0.31 11%Contrast763528 -31%300 -61%970 27%887 16%Colorchecker dE 2000 *6.679.78 -47%8.7 -30%6.7 -0%5.2 22%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *10.3216.39 -59%16.7 -62%15.07 -46%20.3 -97%Greyscale dE 2000 *7.8411.16 -42%11.1 -42%6.25 20%2.8 64%Gamma2.3 96%2.44 90%2.2 100%2.48 89%2.28 96%CCT8076 80%12954 50%12445 52%5954 109%6861 95%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)4241 -2%46 10%Color Space (Percent of sRGB)6563 -3%69 6%Total Average (Program / Settings)-14% /
-18%-5% /
-24%-1% /
6%-7% /
-2%* ... smaller is better
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise↘ 4 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise↘ 20 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 24750 Hz ≤ 30 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 24750 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.
The frequency of 24750 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
Grayscales
Color accuracy
SaturationThe Asus VivoBook E200HA in the sun
The Asus VivoBook E200HA in the shadeCPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15 | JetStream 1.1 Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64BitJumper EZbook 3Intel Celeron N3350
46 Points +70%HP Stream 11-r000ngIntel Celeron N3050
28 Points +4%Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSIntel Atom x5-Z8350
27 Points CPU Multi 64BitAsus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSIntel Atom x5-Z8350
95 Points Jumper EZbook 3Intel Celeron N3350
84 Points -12%HP Stream 11-r000ngIntel Celeron N3050
57 Points -40%JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Jumper EZbook 3Intel Celeron N3350
79.1 Points +127%Lenovo Flex 11 ChromebookMediatek MT8173C
57.1 Points +64%Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSIntel Atom x5-Z8350
34.8 Points
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit27 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit95 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit11.32 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit98 %
Help... in comparison
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Jumper EZbook 3Intel Celeron N3350
1592 Points +9%HP Stream 11-r000ngIntel Celeron N3050
1487 Points +2%Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSIntel Atom x5-Z8350
1464 Points Medion Akoya S2218Intel Atom Z3735F
1027 Points -30%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1464 pointsHelp
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSHynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMCHP Stream 11-r000ng32 GB eMMC FlashJumper EZbook 3Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMCMedion Akoya S221864 GB eMMC FlashCrystalDiskMark 3.0-12%-54%-32% Read Seq163.2154.2 -6%151 -7%140.2 -14% Write Seq115.376.6 -34%50 -57%52.7 -54% Read 512154.9165.8 7%133 -14%98.4 -36% Write 512108.859.9 -45%41.3 -62%58.7 -46% Read 4k16.6218.25 10%5.07 -69%15.25 -8% Write 4k19.2313.16 -32%2.47 -87%9.817 -49% Read 4k QD3230.2546.51 54%16.4 -46%37.24 23% Write 4k QD3228.3213.21 -53%2.74 -90%8.734 -69%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSDHynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMCSequential Read:
163.2 MB/s
Sequential Write:
115.3 MB/s
512K Read:
154.9 MB/s
512K Write:
108.8 MB/s
4K Read:
16.62 MB/s
4K Write:
19.23 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
30.25 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
28.32 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSDHynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMCSequential Read:
160.8MB/s
Sequential Write:
124.7MB/s
4K Read:
14.01MB/s
4K Write:
10.55MB/s
4K-64 Read:
23.97MB/s
4K-64 Write:
25.33MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.228ms
Access Time Write:
0.575ms
Copy ISO:
60.7MB/s
Copy Program:
38.74MB/s
Copy Game:
56.8MB/s
Score Read:
54Points
Score Write:
48Points
Score Total:
135Points
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Jumper EZbook 3Intel HD Graphics 500, Intel Celeron N3350
458 Points +32%HP Stream 11-r000ngIntel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
375 Points +8%Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8350
348 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
395 pointsHelp... in comparison
lowmed.highultraBioShock Infinite (2013)
18.7
8.8
F1 2013 (2013)
28
17
Battlefield 4 (2013)
16.2
12.3
7.9
F1 2014 (2014)
27
16
GTA V (2015)
14.3
Dirt Rally (2015)
40.1
11.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)
8.5
5.6
FIFA 16 (2015)
36.5
14.2
9
Overwatch (2016)
15
9.5
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
20.9
5.8
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
10.7
Max. LoadIdle
40.6 °C39.4 °C27.1 °C 35.6 °C35.1 °C26.3 °C 27.6 °C27.1 °C24.9 °C
Maximum: 40.6 °CAverage: 31.5 °C
25.5 °C35.6 °C40.2 °C25.3 °C30.2 °C37.1 °C25.8 °C27.3 °C29.2 °C
Maximum: 40.2 °CAverage: 30.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 33.4 °C | Room Temperature 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-PocketMax. LoadIdle
28.8 °C26.9 °C23.5 °C 27.6 °C25.4 °C23.3 °C 24.1 °C23.8 °C22.4 °C
Maximum: 28.8 °CAverage: 25.1 °C
23.1 °C27.8 °C29.4 °C22.8 °C26.1 °C28.2 °C22.2 °C23 °C24.3 °C
Maximum: 29.4 °CAverage: 25.2 °C Power Supply (max.) 28.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+0.6 °C / 1.1 F).
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSZ8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)HP Stream 11-r000ngN3050, HD Graphics (Braswell)Jumper EZbook 3Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500Medion Akoya S2218Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)Lenovo Flex 11 ChromebookMT8173C, PowerVR GX6250Heat-4%2%-14%13%Maximum Upper Side *40.642.7 -5%41 -1%42.4 -4%33 19%Maximum Bottom *40.241.3 -3%42 -4%49.7 -24%36 10%Idle Upper Side *28.829 -1%27 6%32 -11%25.2 12%Idle Bottom *29.431.2 -6%27 8%34 -16%25.8 12%* ... smaller is better
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.4% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.1% lower than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Medion Akoya S2218 audio analysis(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 36% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.25 / 0.37 WattIdle 4.3 / 6 / 6.3 Watt
Load
11.4 / 10.8 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSZ8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Hynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMC, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6"HP Stream 11-r000ngN3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 32 GB eMMC Flash, TN, 1366x768, 11.6"Jumper EZbook 3Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.1"Medion Akoya S2218Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6"Lenovo Flex 11 ChromebookMT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6"Power Consumption10%-4%-10%32%Idle Minimum *4.33.1 28%3.18 26%3.8 12%1.5 65%Idle Average *64.8 20%6.14 -2%7.2 -20%5.4 10%Idle Maximum *6.35.1 19%6.4 -2%7.3 -16%5.5 13%Load Average *11.411.9 -4%13.3 -17%11.8 -4%6.3 45%Load Maximum *10.812.3 -14%13.6 -26%13 -20%7.9 27%* ... smaller is better
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSZ8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 38 WhHP Stream 11-r000ngN3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 37 WhJumper EZbook 3Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 38 WhMedion Akoya S2218Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 43 WhLenovo Flex 11 ChromebookMT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 45 WhBattery Runtime WiFi Websurfing534515 -4%420 -21%500 -6%764 43%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 25.10586.672.0)
8h 54min
Pros+ 价格有吸引力
+ 操作无声
+ 良好的输入配件
+ 舒适的打字感觉
+ 电池续航长
+ 低功耗
+ 重量轻Cons- 没有键盘背光
- 盖子可以更加坚固
- TN面板视角不稳定
- 只有2 GB的运行内存
- 只有32GB闪存空间
Asus VivoBook E200HA, test unit provided by Notebooksbilliger.de华硕VivoBook E200HA是一台11.6英寸的小型笔记本。虽说，这台机器不是当下最快的，但它249欧元（约294美元）的价格对消费者来说很有吸引力。消费者将能以此价格，获得一台带有节能的四核处理器的小机器。低重量很好的说明它的便携性，而且该设备还相对坚固。如果我们这台白色的测试机没能吸引到你，你还能购买时尚的蓝色或者金色VivoBook E200HA。
华硕在VivoBook E200HA中封装了非常节能的组件，导致了这台11英寸子小型笔记本有着非常好的、引人注目的排放值。良好的输入配件和长时间的电池续航也为VivoBook E200HA代言。
我们同样被输入配件所折服，即便我们也喜欢背光键盘。该设备在内置显示屏的测试单元失去了一些重要的分数。TN面板不适合户外使用。另外，视角也明显受限，色彩空间覆盖也是如此。在存储方面，操作系统对于32 GB来说太大了。操作系统使用了一半以上的空间，所以几乎没有剩余的用户空间。运行内存也是如此——非常有限的2 GB。任何真正考虑购买华硕VivoBook E200HA的人都应该选择具有64 GB或甚至128 GB存储空间的版本。可惜，运行内存由于不能拓展而不存在更多选择。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
- 07/28/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Chassis78 / 98 → 79%
Keyboard79%
Pointing Device83%
Connectivity36 / 80 → 45%
Weight75 / 35-78 → 94%
Battery91%
Display76%
Games Performance34 / 68 → 49%
Application Performance43 / 87 → 49%
Temperature93 / 91 → 100%
Noise100%
Audio50 / 91 → 55%
Camera37 / 85 → 43%
Average67%
81%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceAsus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS (VivoBook Series)
Price comparison
Please share our article, every link counts!